What is the difference between monitoring and evaluating




















What is the main difference between monitoring and evaluation? For both monitoring and evaluation you will be: Collecting Data Forming Judgments Making Decisions The decisions you will be making, however, will be different. For monitoring, you will be using the data you gather to help you achieve the objectives of your project. As a result, the types of things you might be asking of your monitoring data are: are we over- or under-spending our resources?

Are we reaching the timelines we set for ourselves in our project plan? Are we delivering the finished product or service to the quality we decided on? For evaluation, on the other hand, you will be using the data you gather to help you achieve the objectives of your organisation and help you design a strategy going forward.

What lessons did we learn from this project we can apply in the future going forward? Were our assumptions about what activities would deliver certain outcomes correct? As you can see because evaluation is used to feed into thinking around strategy and long term planning, it tends to have a wider scope.

Monitoring on the other hand has a narrower focus, concerning itself with what is happening within the project at this moment. Summary of differences between Monitoring and Evaluation. Monitoring Normally done by members of the project team as they are implementing the project itself. It might be in the form of project update reports, meetings, quarterly reviews, expenditure reports or time sheets. Information from monitoring is predominantly for the benefit of the project team to help them implement their plans more effectively.

Is focused on what is happening right now to help take in the moment decisions. Has a greater focus on inputs, activities and outputs, although can also include elements of measuring outcomes which arise during the time frame of the project.

As a result, the data you collect is more likely to be quantitative numbers based in nature although may have qualitative elements as well. Puts a greater emphasis on making sure that things are being delivered on time and to budget, with the main priority being on assessing whether things are being done right. There will normally be some element of monitoring throughout the life of a project.

Evaluation Ideally done by individuals outside of the project term and even external to the organisation to provide independence. Main differences between Monitoring Evaluation and Auditing. By admin 0 Comments. Assessment of: -The legality and regularity of the project expenditure and income -Compliance with laws and regulation -Efficient, effective and economical use of project funds Who? Monitoring provides information about the current status and thus helps to take immediate remedial actions, if necessary.

Evaluation provides recommendations, information for long term planning and lessons for organizational growth and success. Monitoring process includes regular meetings, interview, monthly and quarterly reviews etc. Usually quantitative data. Evaluations appraise data and information that inform strategic decisions, thus improving the project or programme in the future. Evaluations should help to draw conclusions about five main aspects of the intervention:. Information gathered in relation to these aspects during the monitoring process provides the basis for the evaluative analysis.

In general, monitoring is integral to evaluation. During an evaluation, information from previous monitoring processes is used to understand the ways in which the project or programme developed and stimulated change. Monitoring focuses on the measurement of the following aspects of an intervention:. Skip to main content.



0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000